Tuesday Sector Leaders: Energy, Materials
The best performing sector as of midday Tuesday is the Energy sector, higher by 1.2%. Within that group, APA Corp (Symbol: APA) and Marathon Petroleum Corp. (Symbol: MPC) are two of the day’s stand-outs, showing a gain of 3.1% and 2.6%, respectively. Among energy ETFs, one ETF following the sector is the Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (Symbol: XLE), which is up 1.4% on the day, and up 5.64% year-to-date. APA Corp, meanwhile, is down 32.80% year-to-date, and Marathon Petroleum Corp., is down 3.92% year-to-date. Combined, APA and MPC make up approximately 3.9% of the underlying holdings of XLE.
The next best performing sector is the Materials sector, higher by 0.2%. Among large Materials stocks, Mosaic Co (Symbol: MOS) and Dow Inc (Symbol: DOW) are the most notable, showing a gain of 2.4% and 1.4%, respectively. One ETF closely tracking Materials stocks is the Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB), which is up 0.1% in midday trading, and down 0.10% on a year-to-date basis. Mosaic Co, meanwhile, is down 28.90% year-to-date, and Dow Inc, is down 22.01% year-to-date. Combined, MOS and DOW make up approximately 3.8% of the underlying holdings of XLB.
Comparing these stocks and ETFs on a trailing twelve month basis, below is a relative stock price performance chart, with each of the symbols shown in a different color as labeled in the legend at the bottom:
Here’s a snapshot of how the S&P 500 components within the various sectors are faring in afternoon trading on Tuesday. As you can see, four sectors are up on the day, while three sectors are down.
Sector | % Change |
---|---|
Energy | +1.2% |
Materials | +0.2% |
Consumer Products | +0.1% |
Healthcare | +0.1% |
Services | -0.0% |
Financial | 0.0% |
Industrial | -0.2% |
Utilities | -0.4% |
Technology & Communications | -0.5% |
10 ETFs With Stocks That Insiders Are Buying »
Also see:
WVVI market cap history
Funds Holding CRML
BOLD Options Chain
The views and opinions expressed herein are the views and opinions of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Nasdaq, Inc.